The Tool Box needs your help
to remain available.
Your contribution can help change lives.
Donate now.
Seeking supports for evaluation?
Learn more.
Learn how to use different sectors based on common social, political, economic, cultural, or religious interests to help you reach Targets and Agents of Change. |
An outreach worker, hired to help establish an English as a Second or Other Language (ESOL) program in a community with a large Portuguese-speaking population, was having difficulty contacting potential students. Partially because of the language barrier and partially because he was an outsider, his efforts at outreach fell flat. He knew he needed help.
The outreach worker decided to contact the people who ran the two major social centers in the community: the soccer club and the Catholic church. The director of the soccer club and the priest were both happy to see him, and acknowledged that there was a real need for ESOL services in the community. Both told him to schedule an informational meeting – they’d see to it that there was an audience.
The priest described the ESOL program and its benefits from the pulpit on two successive Sundays, and urged people to attend the meeting. Going a step further, the director of the soccer club approached numerous individuals who needed the service and issued a personal invitation to the meeting to each of them. He also introduced the outreach worker at the soccer club, where he was able to describe the program and share a beer with many potential students.
By the time of the meeting, word had spread in the community, and the hall was packed. Over 40 people signed up for classes, and many promised to bring their friends as well. When the classes began several weeks later, they were full from the beginning.
This story is true, and is a perfect example of using community sectors – in this case, the religious and the cultural/recreational – to reach the people you need to reach. We'll briefly examine who targets and agents of change are and then explore how to reach those folks through the sectors of the community to which they listen or belong.
“Community sectors” can mean a number of different things. In some cases, it describes broad categories – the public and private sectors, for example, referring respectively to those individuals and organizations that have to do with government in some way and those that don’t. Sometimes, the term “community sector” means community-based organizations, institutions, and initiatives, as opposed to those operated by state government, national or international groups, or large corporations.
In this section, when we refer to “community sectors,” we’re pointing at the various groups that people in the larger community might be divided into for reasons of common social, political, economic, cultural, or religious interests. In some cases, membership in a sector may be conscious (business people as part of the “business sector,” for example.) In others, people may not think about their membership (parents may not think of themselves as helping to make up the “education sector.”) Many individuals may belong to, or have contact with, several of these sectors; others may be considered only in relation to a single one.
So what are these sectors? We’d be hard pressed to name all the sectors that exist in all communities, but there are numerous categories that are common in most communities in the developed world, and in many communities in developing countries as well:
A conservation land trust is an organization that buys land for preservation or conservation, and/or brokers deals to keep undeveloped land in a conservation restriction (where a landowner, either in return for payment or because he wants to keep the area as it is, agrees not to develop the land, and to put that restriction in the deed, so that the land can never be developed). Land trusts of this sort are usually community-based non-profit organizations supported by public contributions.
There can be, as we’ve discussed, a large amount of overlap among sectors. Furthermore, the list above is far from complete: a given community may have other sectors because of its specific nature. A community whose economy is almost entirely agricultural, for instance, may have a rice-growing sector, a dairy sector, a fruit-growing sector, etc. A diverse community may have a Hispanic sector, a Vietnamese sector, a Black sector, a Haitian sector, and a number of others defined by ethnicity and/or language.
Sectors exist because of the common characteristics and/or interests shared by their members. As a result, they can be used, as we’ll see, to reach potential targets and agents of change.
Targets of change are either those whose behavior you want to change or who stand to benefit from the changes your effort aims to bring about. In the first category are both people who will directly benefit from changes in their behavior – smokers who quit, people with high blood pressure who change their diets and exercise patterns – and policy makers, employers, and others whose behavior changes can benefit others (by instituting better workplace safety rules, for example.) We might call these primary targets of change, because, in general, we’re trying to change their behavior directly.
In the second category of targets of change are folks who stand to benefit without necessarily changing their own behavior. These might include low- and moderate-income families that are able to take advantage of affordable housing, or children whose education is improved by changes in curriculum or by new school facilities. They might be seen as secondary targets of change: They are the ones who will benefit directly from the changes an effort is trying to bring about, but their own behavior doesn’t necessarily have to change for that to happen.
Some examples of primary targets of change:
Developers can also be seen as secondary targets of change, if a goal of the effort is to change regulations so that incentives, regulations, or a combination of the two become available to convince them to engage in community-friendly practices.
Some secondary targets of change:
Some of these individuals and groups might be seen as primary targets of change as well -- some may be the objects of an intervention designed to teach them to advocate for themselves, for example. Communities in developing nations, given the proper information, might be able to find and develop their own sources of clean water, build sanitation facilities, or change their farming practices to improve community nutrition. Many programs aimed at people who are homeless are designed to help them learn the skills necessary to find and keep permanent shelter. Workers can be helped to use direct action – negotiation, strikes, picketing – to improve workplace safety. There is, in fact, a thin line between primary and secondary targets of change, and a case can be made that no one should ever be a secondary target. Change may be most effective when those we call secondary targets are encouraged to participate in solving their own dilemmas and to advocate for themselves with other primary targets as well.
Agents of change are those who can help to bring change about. In many cases, these agents are policy makers at some level, either in government or in public or private agencies, organizations, or institutions. In other cases, however, they may be people who can influence those whose behavior your effort is designed to affect. When you’re trying to bring about major political or policy changes, the agents of change might be the whole community, who can put pressure on politicians and policy makers.
Targets and agents of change are, in many instances – perhaps most instances – the same people. In order to create more affordable housing in the community, your targets of change might be legislators or a commissioner or minister that sets housing policy. These same people are also the agents of change, which is exactly why you’re targeting them.
By the same token, agents of change may participate in your effort. If you can recruit officials, the media, the parents of teens subject to violence, or other change agents as partners, you eliminate the need to target them. In fact, they can help you influence the appropriate targets of change, and their presence can greatly increase the effectiveness of your work.
Some of the most common agents of change:
Sometimes, a whole sector is the group you want to reach. The health sector, for instance, can be a powerful pressure group if you’re aiming to change aspects of the health care system (or any part of the political system, for that matter.)
Using community sectors can help to reach people who are associated with a particular sector, as well influence people who are not necessarily associated with the sector used. Some reasons why you might want to use community sectors in this way include:
Using community sectors will usually work best when you already have contacts in the relevant sectors. If you don’t have those contacts, however, this is a good time, and gives you a good reason, to make them. We’ll discuss establishing contacts as we go through some steps you might follow in order to reach the people you want to reach.
This first step is tied in with your strategy for the effort. How are you planning to create change, and whom do you need to influence in order to do so? If you’re starting an advocacy campaign, your targets may be policy makers. If you’re providing a service, you’ll want to contact potential participants or beneficiaries. If you’re seeking to publicize and create excitement about an issue, you’ll probably try to involve the media.
In some cases, you’ll need to reach a number of different individuals and groups. That advocacy effort might need to aim not only at legislators, for instance, but also at people experiencing the problem you’re concerned with. Their telling of their own stories may be a much more powerful way of motivating the passage of a new law than anything your organization can do. In recruiting participants for a service, you might also want to contact teachers, parents, and other individuals and groups that have strong connections with those who might need what you’re offering.
You might have to do some research here. Remember the importance of soccer and the church to the Portuguese community in the introduction to this section? What sector do the people of concern identify with? Whom do they listen to and respect? Who can influence them?
A particular group might best be reached through its religious institutions, another through its schools, and yet another through community elders or leaders. Elected officials can often be reached through two sectors at once: the political sector (i.e., their colleagues) and the electorate (i.e., the public that will or will not vote for them in the next election).
Other sectors that might help are those that people have contact with every day – businesses, radio and TV stations, schools, etc. If they can include your message or materials in their regular contact with your target audience, it’s likely that some of that audience will respond.
Using community sectors to reach people depends on understanding both which sectors those people respond to and which individuals and groups in those sectors are seen as credible and trusted messengers. The fact that a particular agency works with a population doesn’t necessarily mean that its voice is listened to, but there may be individuals within that agency who are listened to. Clergy may be granted high status in many immigrant communities, but a clergy person who has proved feckless or untrustworthy can lose credibility along with that status.
This is where already having contacts in a sector can pay off. If your contact isn’t the right person to reach out to the population of concern, she can probably tell you who is, and perhaps provide an introduction as well. If you don’t have contacts, now is the time to make some.
The best approach to making contacts is always personal. If you don’t know anyone in a sector who can get you started, look for friends, participants, or colleagues that have connections with leaders or others within the sector you’re interested in, and ask them to make an introduction. It will be much easier to establish a relationship if you come “recommended” by someone the person you contact knows. If a personal introduction isn’t practical for some reason, you can phone and explain that “Jim suggested I call you,” which can serve the same purpose.
If you can’t find someone who knows a likely contact, you’ll have to rely on a “cold call,” or calling a person you don’t know. This can be made easier by finding out who is the right person to call, and learning what you can about that person before you get in touch with her. Then, when you call, you can say truthfully, “I think you may be able to help me,” and explain why. Most people will respond to this kind of approach, both because it’s flattering (it says that your contact is an influential or knowledgeable person), and because people generally like to feel helpful.
If you have no connection at all – no one to make an introduction, no mutual acquaintance, no clue as to who an appropriate first contact might be – your cold call may be a little more awkward. You’ll have to make a guess as to whom to try first, and you’ll have to be ready to make several calls before you find the right person.
The best strategy is generally to start with someone who is likely to know many of the people you want to reach. In an immigrant community, this may be a clergy person; in the business sector, it may be the Director of the Chamber of Commerce; in the health sector, a hospital administrator. In the case of the political sector, a good place to start might be with an aide of your own legislator. Once you’re on the phone, the “I hope you can help me” strategy is probably your best bet: explain what you need, and ask for help.
A note here: The reason we assume that a phone call is the medium you’ll use for first contact is that that’s usually the most courteous approach. Whether you’re asking for a meeting or just looking for information, calling may be considered more respectful and personal than e-mail (though some folks do use e-mail as their primary form of communication nowadays). It also gives the other person information about you – your interpersonal style, your knowledge of the issue – and allows him to ask questions and tell you about himself as well. The more personal your approach is, the more likely you are to get the help you need.
Why do you want to reach people? What do you want me to do? These are the first questions that most people will ask when you contact them, and you should have the answers on the tip of your tongue. The answer to the first question should include some information about your organization and your effort, why the effort is positive and necessary, what you hope it will accomplish, and a description of the people you want to involve. The answer to the second question can vary from suggesting other good contacts to walking you around a neighborhood and introducing you to people and organizations.
Whatever the answers are, they should be clear, complete, and accurate. You won’t make friends – or help your reputation – by asking for less than you need and then demanding more later. Think carefully through what you want people to do, and then ask them to do just that. If they want to do less, you can negotiate, and both parties will know what they’re getting.
There are many ways to use community sectors to reach people. We’ve largely focused on using a relatively personal approach, either through individuals, such as clergy or social workers, or through institutions, such as the schools. There are also less direct approaches, such as including a notice about a free blood-pressure reduction program with every receipt at all the pharmacies in the community, or placing a message about the need for adult literacy funding in the programs of arts organizations.
The media sector cuts across all the others as a way to reach a given population. It can be used almost no matter whom you’re trying to reach: it’s just a matter of employing the media outlets that your population of concern is likely to favor. Teens might best be reached through advertisments on music streaming services, for example, or potential volunteers through public TV.
A “sector” to keep in mind is that composed of people you’ve already drawn into your effort as partners, participants in an intervention or program, or change agents. This isn’t really a sector, of course, since it’s usually a mix of people from different sectors, but it’s incredibly useful nonetheless. Ask the folks you’re already working with for help in bringing in their friends and acquaintances. Participants are often the best recruiters for programs, for instance. Legislators are typically seen as credible by other legislators.
To a certain extent, this process divides people into sectors again, but the folks representing each sector in this case have already bought into your effort. They’re more likely to pursue people enthusiastically, and to stick to the task.
Recruiting the first few targets or agents of change doesn’t mean your job is done. Programs and services have to continue to recruit participants in order to serve the community. Advocacy efforts must persist over the long term in order to maintain and consolidate gains, make sure that the issue remains in the public and official consciousness, and continue to make advances. Reaching out to targets and agents of change should continue throughout the life of any effort and beyond, if you want to foster real, positive social change in your community.
Whether your goal in the community is to spread information, deliver a service, run a program or initiative, improve environmental or social conditions, or pursue advocacy, you’ll have to reach targets and agents of change. One way to accomplish that is to go through community sectors – the parts of the community defined by common interests, purposes, and/or backgrounds.
The business sector, the health care sector, the education sector, the government sector, the religious sector, the banking sector – all of these are familiar to most of us, as are many other sectors. Each has its members, as well as those who are outside it but are influenced by it.
In general, people respond to those they trust and those with whom they know they share a common interest. Business owners may therefore be more inclined to listen to messages from the business sector than from politicians or doctors. Immigrants might be more attracted to a program if it’s recommended by other immigrants from their group or by human service organizations they rely on. Thus, by using community sectors to contact and communicate with their members and others they influence, you can spread a wide net in the community, and attract a broad range of people to your effort.